Can wood heat scale to replace coal/oil?

The invisible system behind everything: Energy, Manufacturing, Transportation, Social Services.

Can wood heat scale to replace coal/oil?

Postby Justin Boland » February 24th, 2009, 3:07 pm

Source:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/5132

Short answer which most of you already knew: oh hell no. This was an excellent article, and it turns out it was written by a UVM student at the Gund Institute of Ecological Economics. This is an abridged version:

Use of USA Forests for Home Heating - Can this Sensibly be Expanded?

A short fifty years ago, people heated their homes in winter with coal. A hundred years ago and before, people living in cold climates largely stayed warm in winter with firewood. Today, in a country (and planet) with vastly more people, we heat homes in northern climates largely with high quality fossil fuels, specifically natural gas, heating oil, and propane. Trees, a less energy-dense form of stored sunlight than oil and gas, have recovered a good part of their former % of landcover in the US, despite being still used for paper, wood, furniture, pulp and some heat. Below is an analysis of how the US residential sector heats its homes, how large are our forests and how much they grow and how much wood we could use for heat, after fossil fuels decline.

CURRENT HOME HEATING MIX

The US uses over 7 quadrillion BTUs (quads - written 7,000,000,000,000,000) for heating our homes each winter (out of 100 quads total energy use). Heating needs are a function of a) cold temperatures, b) population and c) efficiency of heating method (I suppose I could add d)tolerance/preference). As seen in the below graphic, natural gas is by far and away our largest source of residential home heat, followed by heating oil and propane, which is a product of both natural gas and crude oil refining.

Image

Electricity makes up a minor part of home heating use - of course, there is also natural gas and coal used as a precursors to electricity but I didn't extend this analysis that far. (About half of all energy used by a household goes to heat and cool the home. (116 billion kWh (2001) = 116 billion * 3,413 Btu = 396 trillion BTUs (.396 quads))

US residential heating is dominated by natural gas - more than 2/3 of our home heating is derived from piped natural gas.

WOOD AND FORESTS

Humans have used wood since the dawn of civilization and historical scarcities of wood have triggered major technological changes. Wood shortages in Greece taught architects how to exploit solar energy. Thousands of years later, shortages of wood forced England into the fossil fuel era, and it began a widespread use of coal. Englands attraction to America was in no small part due to the scarcity of timber resources in the British empire and the awareness of huge wood resources in the New World. In the United States, the market for coal expanded slowly and it was not until 1885 that a low population density, heavily forested nation burned more coal than wood. Even in the world today over 2 billion people use firewood as their primary fuel source.

Image

The US standing forest as of 2002 was 856,000 million cubic feet. The annual growth of this forest is 23,689 million cubic feet, or around 2.5% of the volume.

There is no rule saying removals cant be above growth - that just portends a smaller forest the following year. (It is unclear how much of the dead wood can or could be used, and decaying woods impact on soil nutrients and ecosystems is beyond the scope of this post.)

Less than 10% of our wood use currently goes towards fuel use, and even less of this towards heating. The forest service did not break down this category into fuelwood for home heating and other fuel sources, though one can assume the majority is for residential use (though I know my schools city, Burlington, VT uses wood to generate heat and electricity for the public utility). The total use of 15.7 billion cubic feet is less than the annual total growth of 23.69 billion cf, but there is mortality of 6.3 billion cf which needs to be subtracted (though in theory this would have some heat value).

Essentially, we are using all of our forests growth right now, even at the same time we are using all time record amounts of coal, oil and near record amounts of natural gas.
User avatar
Justin Boland
 
Posts: 323
Joined: January 21st, 2009, 4:01 pm
Location: Springfield, IL

Re: Can wood heat scale to replace coal/oil?

Postby jstorvick » February 24th, 2009, 3:41 pm

Well, there are decent ways of managing trees to provide for firewood/fuel purpose, such as managed woodlots, coppicing, etc. A major problem is that most methods of using wood for heating (ie. wood stoves, fireplaces) are incredibly inefficient - they burn way too fast, use lots of wood, and the heat dissipates very quickly. I meant to post something on this earlier, but this seems like a good place for it: An alternative to wood stove and fireplace heating is the masonry stove, or oven stove.

From Low-Tech Magazine (one hell of a great resource, btw):

http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/12/ ... .html#more

Image

Sunbathing in the living room: oven stoves and heat walls

Oven stoves are greener, more efficient, healthier, safer and cosier than all modern heating systems. Why are they gone and how do we get them back?

An oven stove is a very efficient and robust oven that radiates heat all day. In the US it was introduced only 20 years ago, but in Europe the technology is almost one thousand years old. Especially in Russia, Scandinavia and Central Europe the oven stove has a long and rich tradition.

In the 18th century, several European governments financed research to improve the technology, as a way to overcome an acute shortage of firewood: ecotech before the term existed. However, its further development and distribution was thwarted by the arrival of coal, gas and oil. Oven stoves are large, heavy and slow, but they offer so many advantages that they – again - deserve to be subsidized by the government.

Most people think that the metal stove was the successor of the campfire and the fireplace, and if you only look at the US, that is true. In the New World, there was never a shortage of firewood and therefore no incentive to improve the inefficient fireplace. But in Europe and Northern-Asia, there was an important and succesful link between the fireplace and the metal stove.


Image

It is known as the Russian, Austrian, Finnish, Swedish or German stove, or as “kakelugn” (in Sweden), “pechka” (in Russia), “kachelöfen” or “steinöfen” (in Germany and Austria), and as “tulikivi” (in Finland).

More general terms are tile oven, brick oven, ceramic stove, tiled stove, soapstone heater or masonry heater. The technology is more closely related to a traditional oven than to a metal stove – therefore the German term “kachelöfen” (oven stove) describes it best as an umbrella term.

Oven stoves already appear on drawings and paintings in the 1300s (see illustrations above and below). They are in fact the first real heating appliances in history. Earlier, the Romans invented the hypocaust, a forerunner of central heating, but that knowledge was largely lost when their civilization collapsed.


Image

Oven stoves are traditionally fuelled on wood, but today they can also be equipped to work on gas, or alternately on both fuels. They can even cooperate with a central heating system. An oven stove can take any form or dimensions: it can be almost invisible, built into a wall or underneath the stairs, or it can be an impressive work of art standing in the middle of the living room.

Stone versus metal

The most essential feature of an oven stove is that it is made out of some kind of stone or brick, while all our modern heating appliances are made of steel. Metal heats up fast, but it also cools down just as quickly. Therefore, a metal heating appliance has to be fuelled almost continuously.


Image

Stone requires more time to heat up, but once it has, it holds the heat much longer. An oven stove is only fired for a short time, from a quarter of an hour to one or two hours and only once or twice per day. An average oven stove then radiates heat for at least 12 hours.

Smoke channels

The main part of the heating appliance consists of a labyrinth of smoke channels and smoke rooms. Their aim is to hold the warm gasses inside the oven as long as possible, so that the stone can absorb the heat before it leaves the chimney.

The energetic output of an oven stove is 80 to 90 percent, compared to 40 to 50 percent for metal stoves or central heating appliances, and only 10 to 15 percent for a fireplace – where most heat escapes via the chimney. One of the most striking features of a (wood fuelled) oven stove is the stokehold, which looks ridiculously small compared to the stove itself.

Thanks to the high output, a modest masonry heater or tile stove (heating a room of 60 square meters) only needs 6 cubic meters of wood per year: one tree. If you have even a small garden, you can easily fuel your oven stove by means of your own cuttings – thin wood is very well suited for tile stoves, although it needs to be dry enough.

Radiant heat

All our contemporary heating appliances warm a house or a room mainly by means of convection: they heat up the air. An oven stove does it by means of radiant heat: infrared radiation, comparable to the heat of the sun. In a room that is heated by an oven stove, a thermometer can hardly measure anything.

The effect is comparable to that of a skier who enjoys a schnapps while sunbathing, in spite of the freezing temperatures. Radiant heat does not (only) warm up the air, but particularly also the body of the skier directly.

An oven stove acts in the same way as the sun: it does not so much heat the air, but the floor, the walls, the furniture and the people in the room. These objects in their turn radiate that absorbed heat to their environment – similar to a city radiating heat after a long hot summer day, when the walls and the pavement slowly release back the heat from the sun.

This might sound a bit weird for 21st century computer wizards, but until 150 years ago heating was by definition radiant heating. Heating by convection is a very recent invention, and it has more drawbacks than advantages.

Hot air balloon

Convection causes constant air movement in the house, because hot air is pushed upwards (the principle of a hot air balloon) and cold air is being sucked in (all convectors need a constant supply of air). Warm air rises to the ceiling, while the people that it should warm find themselves on the floor. This is not very efficient. Moreover, it is always too hot close to the radiator or the stove and always too cold at the other side of the room.


Image

Secondly, convection is not healthy. The dust in the house starts floating around, which irritates the respiratory system. In combination with the drying effect of warm air and by the scorching of dust by the metal surfaces of radiators and stoves, this leads to an unpleasant, alkaline air climate, which can cause headaches.


Image

This problem is mostly solved by air humidifiers or electric water heaters, which blow a mix of steam and air into the room. Unfortunately, this creates the ideal conditions for house dust mite and for nasty fungii. You can not open a window to ventilate, because then the warm air escapes quickly.

Sleeping on the stove

An oven stove has none of these disadvantages. Because it hardly warms up air, there is no dust circulation. Because the surface of the oven does not become as hot as the surface of a metal stove or a radiator, there is no scorching of dust.

And because the air does not rise, the heat is distributed evenly across the room, instead of rising to the ceiling (or via an open staircase to the upper floors). This means you can open a window upstairs to ventilate the house, without losing energy.

Because the exterior of an oven stove does not become too hot, there is no danger of burning yourself. This quality is sometimes used to integrate a bench or a couch into the stove, a luxury that no other heating appliance can offer. In Russia it used to be a habit to install beds atop of an oven stove.

Thanks to their warm (but not too warm) exterior, oven stoves offer more possibilities. They are very well suited to keep pots and pans warm, or to dry laundry – metal stoves or radiators are mostly too hot for that. A ceramic stove can be equipped with hot plates and an oven, so that it can be used as a cooking appliance, too.


Image

Complete combustion

Oven stoves are an alternative for all modern heating appliances, but compared to wood stoves they have another, important advantage. More and more people choose wood as an energy source for heating, so that they are not dependent on the unpredictable energy prices of oil and gas.

In one sense this is not a bad thing, since unlike gas and oil, wood is a renewable and CO2-neutral fuel (the CO2 that is produced by the burning of wood was taken out of the atmosphere by the tree during the years before). The problem is that wood stoves are not very efficient, and extremely polluting.

Wood can be burned without too much air pollution, but then the temperature has to be high enough: 1100 to 1200 degrees Celsius. In that case, 99 percent of the wood is converted to CO2 and water vapour, almost without smoke. A metal wood stove, however, only reaches a temperature of 650 to 700 degrees, with an incomplete wood combustion as a result.

Wood consists for two thirds out of combustible gases and for one third out of combustible material. In the case of an incomplete combustion, these gases escape as smoke via the chimney. In regions where many people use wood heating, the air quality worsens dramatically (an incomplete wood combustion is more polluting than the burning of oil or gas).

Overheating

In a wood stove the fire is quelled by diminishing the supply of air, if not the room would overheat by the fast release of warmth by the metal appliance. Because an oven stove does not immediately release the heat of the fire, but stores it temporarily in the masonry mass, wood can be burned at a very high temperature without overheating the room.

An oven stove is always stoked at full power, even if a lower temperature is desired: in that case you simply stoke a smaller portion of wood, or you stoke less often.

A complete combustion is not only advantageous for air quality and efficiency, it is also safer. In the case of an incomplete combustion, the chimney gets ever more densely set with creosote, which can lead to a chimney fire when one day the stove is fuelled at full power (the reason why a chimney has to be cleaned regularly).

Instant heat

Oven stoves have some disadvantages, too, although none of them are insuperable. Probably the largest drawback is the fact that a tile stove or masonry heater does not deliver the instant heat that we got used to.

If you turn on the gas stove, you are almost immediately rewarded with heat. But an oven stove takes a couple of hours before it starts radiating heat. That is not such a problem during long, cold periods, because once the cycle has been started and the stove is stoked shortly each morning, the house is always warm.

It is less obvious during periods with large temperature fluctuations, or when you travel a lot. You can make the best of that, by dressing warm for instance, or in a less low-tech way by installing an extra heating appliance – like a gas stove – in the same room.

This second heating generator may also be a much smaller tile stove, or a ceramic oven (a small tile stove meant solely for cooking). The small one can then be used to heat up the room relatively fast while the large one is warming up. A tile stove equipped with two stokeholds, a big one for the heating and a smaller one for cooking, offers the same possibility.

Overheating

A masonry heater neither delivers the fine temperature tuning of other heating appliances. If a wood or gas stove is overheating the room, you simply turn it lower and the temperature goes down fast. With a tile stove, this is impossible to do.


Image

If you burn too much wood or gas in the morning, this decision can not be reversed during the course of the day. There is no option left but to open the windows, and that is not so efficient anymore. Heating a room to the right temperature thus requires some practice and dedication, especially in a climate which is not like it is in Russia or Finland.


Image

A third disadvantage of the tile stove is a consequence of radiant heat. An oven stove only heats the room where it is positioned. Opening the door will not warm up the room next to it, because it is largely lying in the “shadow” of the radiant heat.

This is again comparable to a warm sun on a winter day: if you step out of the sun into the shade, the radiant heat is gone and all you feel is the air temperature. A gas or wood stove does not perform too well on this either, but a central heating system seems to be the indisputable winner. However, a tile stove does not exclude a system of central heating.

Heat walls

Heat walls or heat floors are another way of applying radiant heat. Here, warm water is not led through plate steel radiators as in a conventional central heating system, but through plastic hoses which are integrated into the walls (or into fake walls). Because of its porous surface a stone wall can not heat up air, it radiates like a tile stove.


Image

Heat walls can be combined with an oven stove. The stove is connected to a boiler system, which distributes the warm water via hoses in the walls or the floor throughout the house. In this way one tile stove (assuming it is powerful enough) can heat up all rooms in a house, something which is otherwise not possible. In the same way a tile stove can deliver warm water for a household.


Image

Heat walls can also be combined with an existing central heating appliance. This is already a step in the right direction, because the energy consumption goes down (the water does not have to be as warm as in the case of a traditional central heating system, because the heat is radiated over a larger surface area) and you get a better interior air climate.


Image

As a third possibility an oven stove can also be connected to a network of metal radiators (as in this church), but in that case you lose the advantage of radiant heat. Steel plate radiators warm up the air.

Heavy, bulky and expensive

Another, quite fundamental drawback is that oven stoves are rather big and heavy. A modest tile stove amounts to at least 800 kilograms, and big ones (especially in the US and the former Soviet Union) can weigh up to 5 tonnes, or more. Smaller models exist, but they lose some advantages compared to their larger brothers (they have to be stoked more often, and do not always reach a complete wood combustion, or the same energy efficient output).

A masonry heater needs to be large and heavy, there is nothing one can do about that. Metal heating appliances have the indisputable advantage of being compact.

Masonry stoves also cost 2 to 3 times as much as other heating systems. Since the energy consumption costs are lower, and a well-built oven stove lasts a lifetime, this investment pays itself back after a while. However, you have to be able to afford the purchase.

In Finland, a major producer of soapstone heaters, the purchase of an oven stove is subsidized by the government, with the consequence that 90 percent of new houses has them inside.

Oven stoves are expensive because they are products of craftsmanship. They are not really suited for mass production (although efforts are being made), and are therefore not of much interest to the heating industry. They prefer to sell, for example, pellet stoves.

Pellet stoves

A pellet stove is the only wood stove that reaches a complete combustion like an oven stove does. Sophisticated technology is used to accomplish this – which is also the weak point of this heating system.

A pellet stove needs electricity to power all the high-tech (conveyor belt, ventilation, temperature regulation, and so on), which means that this electricity use should be taken into account when calculating the environmental score. Furthermore, a pellet stove stops delivering heat when there is a breakdown.

A pellet stove can only be fed with pellets, small rods made of wood, which are processed in a factory. Pruned wood or sawed wood are of no use in a pellet stove. Producing these pellets requires a lot of energy.

Another consequence is that once again you are dependent on the unpredictable prices of an energy supplier. Also, a pellet stove mainly heats up the air and hardly emits any radiant heat, so there is no health advantage compared to a wood stove, a gas stove or a central heating system. Thanks to all the high-tech inside, however, a pellet stove costs as much as an oven stove.

Fake oven stoves

Now that oven stoves are gaining some popularity again, the manufacturers of metal heating appliances try to get a slice of the pie. A few have started offering them according to traditional methods, sending masons to your house to build whatever oven stove you desire.

Most manufacturers, however, now use radiant heat as a greenwash promotion strategy. There are now stoves on the market that look like an oven stove, only they are not. They are normal metal stoves, wrapped in tiles. They betray themselves by grates to let in cool air, something an oven stove does not need (see picture below).


Image

Of course the tiles get hot when the stove is running, but they cool down just as fast when it is turned off. These appliances are promoted as an ideal combination of both technologies, but they are simply convection stoves. They hardly emit any radiant heat, they scorch dust and they have a lower performance. Yet, they sell.

Another example is this German wood stove, pictured below. It is enthusiastically being promoted as a modern variant of an oven stove, and it will appeal to steampunks and survivalists, yet this is just a plain wood stove, not very efficient and very polluting.

Burning the woods

The oven stove is the only technology that allows a clean burning of wood without the need for another energy input, and thus it is the only technology that promises an environmentally friendly alternative for the dwindling resources of gas and oil.

The crucial question is whether the earth can produce enough wood to keep a significant amount of people warm. Today’s energy crisis is not the first in human history. Starting in the 15th century, some countries in Europe already faced a serious shortage of firewood and this became an acute problem in the 17th and 18th century, which only got “resolved” by the arrival of coal.

It seems impossible that the present European population could again be warmed by wood, because there are now many more people than in those times. But there is some hope that the potential is larger than expected.

The massive deforestation in the Middle Ages was the consequence of the fireplace, which needs ten times as much fuel as an oven stove (wood was also the main construction material). Even though the tile stove is almost 10 centuries old, it only broke through on a large scale in the 19th century, and even then only in some European countries.

The potential of the technology was never fully developed because of the start of the industrial revolution, and the abundance of coal. Research has yet to reveal how large the potential of wood as a fuel can be if we would use oven stoves, but it is surely greater than if we would return to wood stoves.

© Kris De Decker (edited by Vincent Grosjean)

Thanks to De Twaalf Ambachten


Wiki article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masonry_heater
User avatar
jstorvick
 
Posts: 111
Joined: January 21st, 2009, 12:21 pm
Location: Woodbridge, VA

Re: Can wood heat scale to replace coal/oil?

Postby Justin Boland » February 24th, 2009, 4:05 pm

Yeah, the best job I ever had was building masonry stoves with my friend Wu Di, who is registered here but he's been mighty quiet. He's working on a number of information sites about masonry heaters to promote his business, and he's also perfecting his core designs...we're thermal nerds in Vermont.

The photos in that post are amazing!
User avatar
Justin Boland
 
Posts: 323
Joined: January 21st, 2009, 4:01 pm
Location: Springfield, IL

Re: Can wood heat scale to replace coal/oil?

Postby jstorvick » February 24th, 2009, 4:15 pm

Using rocket stoves for cooking and masonry stoves for heating (or combining the two?) might seriously reduce wood use, especially when combined with responsible woodlot management strategies.

Yeah, aren't those photos killer? Definitely check out that Low-Tech Magazine site - its full of cool and useful stuff like that.
User avatar
jstorvick
 
Posts: 111
Joined: January 21st, 2009, 12:21 pm
Location: Woodbridge, VA

Re: Can wood heat scale to replace coal/oil?

Postby sharqi » February 25th, 2009, 9:28 am

Those are some beautiful pictures. I wish zoning ordinances and the people insuring our mortgage would have more of an open mind to what is possible and what works.

Think of a city as an urban forest, which here in Springfield, it is. We had three trees taken down after tornado/ice storms. I think we've used at least one, and maybe will have used two by the time winter is over. Trees can be sustainably harvested, leaving a healthier (urban) forest. It galls me to think that Springfield incinerated the "waste" debris after natural disasters. To think if they would say, hey the problem is the solution. The solution is we need to go into the firewood business! (Thinking regional firewood businesses would make more sense than the government to set up a department of firewood.) From Arkansas to Kentucky, there's probably more firewood than anyone can handle.

Another issue is that if you are providing for your own heat, you might not be so concerned at keeping it at 75 degrees. Waking up to a 50 degree house is cold, but not deathly. Also, if your house is 60, and you're right up next to the woodstove, you're still warm, especially while wearing layers, and with a glass of homebrew in hand. It's been really cold this winter, probably just a real average winter, but it's been very mild the last many. We've had extended cold temps. Our woodstove can't keep up when it gets below about 10 and the wind is blowing, but we just put on more layers and adjust. You don't get chillblains until you're in constant 50 degree weather.

We are blessed with an old home, and most of our southern exposure in our living room is windows. If the sun is shining, it feels warm, no matter what the temperature is. And we don't have thermal mass (just a wood floor) to keep and radiate this heat, but if we did! If it is 30 out and cloudy, I keep remembering to put on more wood because it feels chilly.

I've seen plans for the solar heat boxes that are painted black with glass on top, and angled from the ground to a cracked open window, that allow warm air in during the day. There are a lot of designs to ramp up passive solar heat. There's so many options to augment wood heat. And why not do it? It only makes sense.

Outdoor rocket stoves seem logical to cooking in central Illinois' brutal summer heat and humidity. Also, community canneries would make a logical alternative to heating up one's own home. I've seen people crank their air when they're canning, and it mystifies me. I mean, I understand it's really uncomfortable being in 100 degree temps, 100 percent humidity, and boiling water for hours on a stove. But it won't kill you.

carey
sharqi
 
Posts: 51
Joined: February 10th, 2009, 12:50 pm
Location: Springfield, Illinois

Re: Can wood heat scale to replace coal/oil?

Postby dlollard » March 1st, 2009, 12:44 pm

I was just doing dishes, and it occurred to me to think not in terms of "can X scale up?" but in terms of "X CAN supplement, how can we integrate X?"

Seems like pretty much anything would be better than coal ... except maybe nuclear.

Back to dishes!

Don
the screen is a prison for the body
User avatar
dlollard
 
Posts: 45
Joined: January 28th, 2009, 9:22 pm

Re: Can wood heat scale to replace coal/oil?

Postby Sticomythia » October 16th, 2009, 1:00 pm

Folks,

Now that we're pleasantly cool in Vermont, the heat wave is past, it might be a good time to bring back this thread. Wood should scale just fine if properly managed as a resource; the solution for the inefficiency of today's woodstoves is not a catalytic converter, to keep the ash off your neighbour's SUV. The solution is old tech which has been largely ignored in Vermont, energy prices being still comparatively low. There's been a return to apathy now that a Democrat got in the White House.

Posted the following on my blog at Vermont Commons recently. We are getting a masonry stove in from Austria before Obama's EPA crack down on masonry stoves as well (my Lister generator project got held up by an EPA crackdown on alternative fuels).

http://www.vtcommons.org/blog/2009/08/3 ... nti-pellet

The American wood stove, of whatever breed, is a terror! It requires more attention than a baby. It has to be fed every little while, it has to be watched all the time; and for all the reward you are roasted half your time and frozen the other half... and when your wood bill comes in you think you have been supporting a volcano. -Mark Twain, 1891, Some National Stupidities

My neighbour succumbed to trend and bought a pellet stove; a bit of cheap technology, another collection of moving parts to make our lives better and foster some illusion of self-sufficiency. He then discovered that it was grid-dependent; each time the power went off, carbon monoxide alarm sounded --- In a pellet stove CO backs up into the house when the fan does not run.

To make the poison gas go away, he had to buy a generator as well. Now any time of the night when the electricity fails, my neighbour is wheeling that generator out, slopping fresh gasoline into it and pulling the starter cord.

The pellets consumed in Vermont are largely trucked in from Georgia. The single startup firm in Vermont which manufactures pellets for the Acorn Coop, is utterly dependent on chemicals which are imported from China. If the imports (credit) stop, pellets stop. We decided to go a different route.

Image
Masonry Stove (Kachelofen)

The Kachelofen, (Masonry Heater) with its 90% combustion efficiency, no moving parts, as well as the potential to last for hundreds of years given competent care, became popular in Europe centuries ago, as wood resources became scarce and expensive. Is this at all familiar to you, energy turning from a buyer's to a seller's market?

It may seem that we have infinite wood resources here in Vermont. Yet, about a century ago, Vermont had been virtually clear-cut. Resource extraction (tax-free) had pushed subsistence to the most marginal lands. We are well on our way back there again, seeing arguments about returning Vermont's marginal land to food production, if we are to be self-sufficient...

But, do we have Kachelofens in Vermont? Almost not. Twain wrote, It is certainly strange that useful customs and devises do not spread from country to country with more facility and promptness than they do. Henry George also wrote that Free trade consists simply in letting people buy and sell as they want to buy and sell... blockading squadrons are a means whereby nations seek to prevent their enemies from trading; protective tariffs are a means whereby nations attempt to prevent their own people from trading. What protection teaches us is to do to ourselves in time of peace what enemies seek to do to us in time of war.

Self-sufficiency is a myth; a free Vermont with access to global trade is sustainable. We could also manufacture much better stoves than the EPA would allow us, as they do in the EU today...

A bit more from Mark Twain about the Kachelofen: To the uninstructed stranger it promises nothing. It has a little bit of a door...which seems foolishly out of proportion to the rest of the edifice. Small-sized fuel is used, and marvelously little of that. The process of firing is quick and simple. At half past seven on a cold morning the servant brings a small basketfull of slender pine sticks and puts half of these in, lights them with a match, and closes the door. They burn out in ten or twelve minutes. He then puts in the rest and closes the door...the work is done.

All day long and into the night all parts of the room will be delightfully warm and comfortable... the cost is next to nothing; the heat produced is the same all day, instead of too hot and too cold by turns...


Cheers,
Rod in Ripton
http://www.vtcommons.org/blog/sticomythia
User avatar
Sticomythia
 
Posts: 2
Joined: October 14th, 2009, 1:15 pm
Location: Ripton, Vermont


Return to Infrastructure

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron